Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1957 Chevy Napco Factory Installed With 17.5 Wheels 1/2 Ton 5400 Gvw Rare on 2040-cars

Year:1957 Mileage:102000
Location:

Bedford, New Hampshire, United States

Bedford, New Hampshire, United States
Engine:235
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: 22222222222222222 Year: 1957
Make: Chevrolet
Drive Type: 4 SPD
Model: Other Pickups
Trim: REG
Mileage: 102,000
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This is a factory installed NAPCO 5400 GVW with a riveted cross member. It also has 17.5 " wheels. The wheels are more rare than the truck. The condition of the truck is as follows: the body has it's typical rust and would need cab corners but the worse part is the amount of dents in the cab. The rear fenders I just replaced with some nice used ones I had here. The front fenders and hood are also nice and can be reused in the restoration. In my opinion, the driver's and passenger doors would be best replaced; they are pretty much rust free but they have many dents. The engine is an original 235 and runs great. The transmission seems to shift fine and the four wheel drive parts seem fine. The seat has been recovered and the only thing that the truck needs to be road worthy is to finish hooking up the lights. This truck is a very desirable 1/2 ton, short bed and I think could be worth $40,000 - $50,000 when finished. The truck comes with the tires that are in the back. They are 16" factory wheels with new Coker tires. The Chevy signs on the truck will not be included in the sale. I would be interested in selling them separately. They are cool. This truck was found out in the desert of Arizona and must have been worked by a miner out there.

Give me a call if you have any questions. Dave 603-234-6798

Auto Services in New Hampshire

R L Cycle & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Motorcycles & Motor Scooters-Repairing & Service
Address: 47 Lawrence Rd, Newton-Junction
Phone: (603) 894-4777

Majestic Motors ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 734 Daniel Webster Hwy Ste R,# R, Dunbarton
Phone: (603) 261-2025

Gurney`S Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 83 Broad St, Brookline
Phone: (603) 886-4843

Colonial North End Subaru Mazd ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 757 Chase Rd, Greenville
Phone: (978) 582-4911

Billerica Tire & Auto Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 7 Everett Farmer Rd, Pelham
Phone: (978) 670-9330

Auclair`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Commercial Auto Body Repair
Address: 444 Riverside Dr, Pelham
Phone: (978) 291-6272

Auto blog

Feds open investigation into Chevy Express, Ford Freestar rust issues

Wed, 28 Dec 2011

'Tis the season... for road salt. And with that, comes rust. And what does rust bring? Well, for Ford and General Motors, a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigation. According to The Detroit News, NHTSA is looking into potential recalls issues with Chevrolet Express vans and Ford Freestar minivans.
The feds have received five complaints that rust has caused leaking fuel filler pipes on 2003 Express vans. Separately, seven complaints have been filed over excessive rust in the rear wheel wells of 2004 Ford Freestar and Mercury Monterey minivans. The Freestar and Monterey went out of production in 2007. Neither issue has resulted in any crashes or injuries, according to the report.

Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]

Tue, 05 Feb 2013

Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.

GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect

Tue, 17 Aug 2010

2010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.