2013 Dodge Grand Caravan Sxt on 2040-cars
1700 N Hervey St, Hope, Arkansas, United States
Engine:3.6L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 2C4RDGCG8DR527521
Stock Num: B2837
Make: Dodge
Model: Grand Caravan SXT
Year: 2013
Exterior Color: Stone White Clearcoat
Interior Color: Black / Light Graystone
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 38181
GREAT LOCAL TRADE. ALL VEHICLES 125 POINT INSPECTION. CALL TODAY FOR THE BEST PRICE ON A GREAT LOCAL VEHICLE. WILL BEAT OUT TEXARKANA AND LITTLE ROCK PRICE FROM UR HOME TOWN HOPE DEALERSHIP.
Dodge Grand Caravan for Sale
- 2013 dodge grand caravan sxt(US $21,980.00)
- 2012 dodge grand caravan sxt(US $22,450.00)
- 2003 dodge grand caravan sport(US $6,950.00)
- 2013 dodge grand caravan sxt(US $20,900.00)
- 2014 dodge grand caravan sxt
- 2010 dodge grand caravan se(US $11,900.00)
Auto Services in Arkansas
Winchester Tire & Alignment ★★★★★
Texarkana Glass Co ★★★★★
Steve Landers Chrysler Dodge Jeep ★★★★★
Seeburg Muffler & Brake ★★★★★
Precision Tune Auto Care ★★★★★
Jones Tire & Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
We cruised Woodward in the 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat [w/video]
Tue, 19 Aug 2014
We were definitely rock stars at the 20th edition of the Dream Cruise.
The yell came from somewhere in the crowd: "Hey Hellcat, push it!" We obliged with a jab of the throttle, and the 707 horses of the 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat roared to life. It went on like this. All weekend. It's one thing to attend the Woodward Dream Cruise, it's quite another to star in it.
1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express in Generation Gap showdown with 1933 Ford Pickup
Fri, 18 Jul 2014Auto enthusiasts love a good debate, whether it's Mustang versus Camaro or Ferrari against Lamborghini. But how about a battle between two very different vintages of classic pickup trucks? In this case, the fight is between a 1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express and a 1933 Ford Model 46 truck with a flathead V8.
The shootout comes courtesy of the internet series Generation Gap, and its concept is super-simple. One guy prefers classics, and the other likes newer rides. They choose a category, pick two vehicles and put them head to head. In this case, neither is exactly modern, though. The Ford is more than old enough to receive Social Security checks, and the Dodge is hardly a young whippersnapper.
Other than both being pickups, these two models were made to serve very different functions. The Li'l Red Express was basically the progenitor of today's muscle trucks, with a big V8 that made it one of the quickest new models in its day (admittedly, 1979 was a rough time for automotive performance). On the other hand, the '33 Ford was just meant to work, with little pretense for anything else. One of the hosts describes it as "the simplest, most difficult" vehicle he's driven because of the tricky double clutchwork necessary to shift gears. Scroll down to watch the video and try to decide which of these two American classics you would rather have in your garage.
Chrysler recalling 644k more Dodge Durango and Jeep Grand Cherokee SUVs over brakes
Wed, 02 Apr 2014Early last month, we reported on Chrysler issuing a preemptive, proactive recall for about 25,000 units of the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango. The issue revolved around a brake system that wasn't causing any actual problems, but delivered an unsatisfactory brake feel, so Auburn Hills called in a good 25,000 of SUVs around the world, including 18,700 in the United States.
Now Chrysler, having apparently determined that the brake problem on its sport utes is actually much bigger than it initially realized, has drastically broadened the scope of the recall. As a result, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has issued a recall for precisely 655,354 examples of the Grand Cherokee and Durango, covering the 2011 through 2014 model years. In addition, Chrysler is recalling 42,380 units in Canada, 21,376 in Mexico and 159,685 overseas.
The problem which Chrysler found revolves around the brake booster, whose center shell has been found to be subject to corrosion, allowing water to get into the brake system. That water in turn could freeze, preventing the brakes from working as well as expected.