1998 Ford E-150 Custom Universal Braun Millenium Wheel Chair Lift Disablily Taxi on 2040-cars
Peru, Illinois, United States
Body Type:Standard Cargo Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Ford
Model: E-150 Econoline
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: XL Standard Cargo Van 2-Door
Options: Cabin Lights, Cassette Player
Drive Type: RWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 170,009
Power Options: Power Wheel Chair Lift, Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: Universal
Exterior Color: White
Disability Equipped: Yes
Interior Color: Blue
Number of Cylinders: 8
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
- 1991 ford e250 econoline sportsmobile penthouse pop-top camper like vw winnebago(US $7,980.00)
- Ford econoline 100 custom shorty
- 01 e350 passenger van luxury conversion 11 12 15(US $7,490.00)
- 1997 e450 ford crystel 28 passengers mini-coach(US $12,000.00)
- 2007 ford e 350 super duty extended 15 passenger van 5.4 triton v8 auto trans(US $8,995.00)
- Ford e 350 turbo diesel 7.3 super duty ! ambulance ! low miles !(US $10,000.00)
Auto Services in Illinois
Vega Auto Repair ★★★★★
Ultimate Deals Vehicle Sales ★★★★★
Tredup`s Inc ★★★★★
Terry`s Service ★★★★★
Stan`s Repair Service ★★★★★
St Louis Dent Company ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford Focus Electric and ST recalled over lighting issue
Mon, 12 Aug 2013Ford is recalling 6,308 units of the 2012 and 2013 Focus Electric and 2013 Focus ST that were fitted with HID headlights because a "wiring incompatibility" could keep the front side marker lights from working. A bulletin from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says the recall should begin in the middle of this month, after which owners can take their cars to dealers to have the wiring assembly repaired free of charge.
You can find more information in the NHTSA bulletin posted below.
And the Top Gear UK Cars of the Year for 2013 are...
Tue, 17 Dec 2013Those loony Brits at Top Gear have named their Car of the Year, and if you're thinking it's the McLaren P1, Jaguar F-Type, Land Rover Range Rover Sport or Rolls-Royce Wraith, we're sorry to inform you that none of those Anglo automobiles earned the crown. In fact, the winner of Top Gear's most prestigious award is quite the surprise.
Of course, those cars weren't without their own awards. The P1 was the top hypercar (sorry, Porsche 918 and Ferrari LaFerrari), while the F-Type netted best convertible and the Range Rover Sport was voted SUV of the Year. Other honorable mentions included the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Black and S-Class, the Porsche 911 GT3, the BMW i3 and the Ferrari 458 Speciale. The winner, though, wasn't even a high-dollar supercar. It was the Ford Fiesta ST.
Yes, the Fiesta ST beat out some off-the-wall cars like the revolutionary Volkswagen XL1 and the bonkers Peugeot 208 T16 Pikes Peak, not to mention all the cars we listed above, to take the title of Top Gear Car of the Year. And if you've driven one, you'll completely understand why.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.