2012 Ford E350 Cargo Van on 2040-cars
Ramsey, New Jersey, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:8
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
Make: Ford
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Model: E-Series Van
Mileage: 6,212
Sub Model: Cargo Van
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: Other
Doors: 2
Interior Color: Other
Drive Train: Rear Wheel Drive
Inspection: Vehicle has been inspected
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
- 2011 ford e-350 15 passenger extended van 10 12 warranty 5.4l v8 flex low miles(US $17,970.00)
- 1990 ford e350 cargo ext van / diesel eng / 60 day layaway / worldwide shipping(US $2,250.00)
- 2007 ford e350 12 pas van v8 auto ac 91k miles clean(US $9,900.00)
- 2008 ford econoline e150 cargo van 4.6l v8 tommy lift automatic low miles
- 2004 ford e-250 base standard cargo van 2-door 5.4l
- 2004 ford e150 loaded highroof conversion van! fully serviced.exc.condition!(US $11,900.00)
Auto Services in New Jersey
Yellow Bird Auto Diagnostic ★★★★★
White Horse Auto Pke ★★★★★
Vulcan Motor Club ★★★★★
Ultimate Drive Auto Repair ★★★★★
Sparx Auto ★★★★★
Same Old Brand ★★★★★
Auto blog
2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid
Mon, 01 Apr 2013Your Mileage May Vary
As difficult as it is to write this, I was actually excited about the 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid. With the beautiful looks of the newest midsize fighter from Ford and a fuel economy estimate capable of shaming even the stalwart Camry Hybrid, the battery-augmented four-door seemed like a recipe for unabashed success. But appearances love nothing more than swapping our boundless enthusiasm for cold platters of disappointment. The 2013 Fusion Hybrid gets hobbled right out of the gate with a lofty price tag, and real-world driving keeps the sedan from even approaching those EPA figures.
With so many excellent midsize hybrids on the market, is there any reason to consider the newest Fusion Hybrid? Are sharp aesthetics, a well-executed interior and capable driving dynamics enough to overcome the machine's shortfalls? Not from where I'm standing.
Ford Q1 profits dragged down by warranty costs
Fri, 25 Apr 2014General Motors isn't the only Detroit automaker posting falling profits in the first quarter. Ford just released its Q1 2014 financial data, and it reported a net income of $989 million, down $622 million from Q1 2013. The drop is partially blamed on higher warranty and recall expenses than the company had anticipated.
Financially, Ford suffered a rough quarter almost across the board. Its pre-tax profit of $1.4 billion was also down $765 million from a year ago. Things were even worse in the North American market where operating profit fell significantly to $1.5 billion, down from $2.392 billion in Q1 2013. However, its global revenue ticked up slightly to $35.9 billion, from $35.6 billion in this period in 2013.
Ford admitted that it spent about $900 million on expenses that it hadn't planned for during this quarter. According to Reuters, the company paid about $400 million in additional warranty and recall costs in North America. The automaker didn't explain why the costs were so much higher than expected. However, in the last three months, Ford has had several recalls, including on the 2001-2004 Escape for rust, Explorer for its steering, Edge for its fuel line and others.
NHTSA closes Ford F-150 EcoBoost acceleration probe
Mon, 14 Apr 2014Typically when we report on the findings of an investigation from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, it's because the government body has discovered a safety issue and prescribed a recall. In this case, however, NHTSA has closed an investigation into a reported performance deficit without ever getting to the recall stage.
The issue revolves around the Ford F-150 - specifically those equipped with the 3.5-liter EcoBoost engine - of which some 360,000 were built in the 2011, 2012 and 2013 model years. After receiving an initial 95 complaints, NHTSA opened an investigation last May - almost a year ago - into the reported issue of reduced engine power under hard acceleration. The agency has since received a total of 525 such complaints, and Ford itself reported receiving over 4,000.
Together, NHTSA and Ford determined that the problem resulted from cylinders misfiring, an issue itself stemming from water getting into the charge air cooler (CAC) mated to the turbochargers. In particularly humid or rainy conditions, water was found to get into the CAC, causing some of the cylinders to misfire, which in turn triggered the ECU to disable those cylinders in order to protect the catalytic converter from damage.