2000 Ford Excursion Limited Sport Utility 4-door 6.8l on 2040-cars
Abbeville, South Carolina, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.8L 415Cu. In. V10 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Make: Ford
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Model: Excursion
Trim: Limited Sport Utility 4-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, Leather Seats, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: 4WD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Tan
Number of Cylinders: 10
Mileage: 146,535
2000 Ford Excursion Limited 4wd Black over gold has 35" wildspirits on factory rims, clean interior for vehicle off this age does have a few minor defects. Exterior is pretty good other than a small dent on driver side corner behind rear bumper. Has Aftermarket Kenwood Stereo receiver and is wired for amp and subs. Runs and drives good. Only repairs I know of it need is a window motor in passenger rear door. Please let me know if you have any questions. Buyer must pick up vehicle from Abbeville, SC 29620, or arrange for shipping. Payment methods will be Paypal, cash, money order or certified check. Vehicle is also listed for sale locally and auction may be ended at anytime if sold. Is being Sold AS IS all sales are final. Feel free to contact me come look at it for bidding or If your to far away I will answer any questions as honestly as I can.
Ford Excursion for Sale
- 2003 ford limited excursion new michilin tires rearveiw back-up cam 103,000mls(US $17,500.00)
- Ford excursion eddie bauer leather tv dvd 3rd row free autocheck no reserve
- 01 excursion limited 6.8l v10-163k-rear entertainment-heated seats-parking aid(US $5,995.00)
- 2001 ford excursion limited
- 2003 ford excursion xlt dark grey leather interior, 5.4 v8 3rd row seat(US $5,200.00)
- 2004 ford excursion limited sport utility 4-door 6.0l(US $30,500.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
Wilburn Auto Body Shop-Gastonia ★★★★★
We Buy Junk Cars Charlotte.Com ★★★★★
Watson Lube & Tire Center ★★★★★
Washington Rd Tire and Auto ★★★★★
Vaden Vw ★★★★★
Tire Town South ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford Fiesta 1.0L EcoBoost sales robust in early going
Tue, 13 May 2014Okay, okay, okay, so I was just a smidge wrong. Those that read my review of the Ford Fiesta with the new 1.0-liter, EcoBoost engine will know that while I really enjoyed the torquey little three-cylinder, I was concerned that Ford's decision to force 1.0-liter owners into a manual transmission, steel wheels and one trim level might hurt sales of the new engine. I was also concerned that the promised 45-mile-per-gallon highway rating wouldn't be enough to tempt buyers into trying an engine that's so far outside of what the general public is use to. My concerns, though, seem to have been for naught.
While not doing a booming business on the triple-equipped Fiesta, Ford is seeing a take rate of four to eight percent per month in the engine's first few months on sale. Now, four to eight percent might not sound like a lot - if, like last year, the Fiesta sells around 71,000 units, there'd be barely 5,600 1.0-liter models on the road. It is also small potatoes relative to the take rate on EcoBoost-equipped vehicles across the Ford range, which US sales analyst Erich Merkle estimates to be roughly 35 to 40 percent of retail sales. Still, according to The Detroit News, the 1.0-liter is getting adopted at roughly the same rate as the sparkling Fiesta ST, which should be a solid indication of just how well this little engine is doing.
The 1.0-liter's success "really speaks volumes, not just to what we're doing with the Fiesta, but with EcoBoost in general," Merkle told Autoblog.
Ford recalls select Explorer, E-Series vans
Tue, 21 Jan 2014Just a few days ago we brought you news that Ford had issued a recall on 28,000 units of the Edge crossover for problems related to the fuel line. But now the Blue Oval has issued recall notices on two more of its larger vehicles.
The first relates to the Explorer, 395 examples of which from the 2011 and 2012 model years were found to have problems with their steering systems if they underwent service after September 1, 2013. An apparent software glitch could lock the steering gear, preventing the driver from steering the vehicle and thereby increasing the risk of a crash. As a result, Ford dealers are being instructed to check their records to identify the problematic vehicles and bring them in to have the steering gear replaced. Details of the recall can be found in the PDF linked here.
The second problem revolves around E-Series vans that may develop bubbles in their windshields under hot temperatures. The decrease in visibility through the problematic windshield could - you guessed it - "increase the risk of a crash." As a result, Ford is calling in 4,532 units of the E-150, E-250, E-350 and E-450 vans built in the relatively short window between May 12 and May 26, 2011. Details of this recall can be found in the notice below from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.