2001 Ford F250 4x4 ,super Duty,4 Door, Lifted,custom, on 2040-cars
Fernley, Nevada, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Make: Ford
Drive Type: 4x4
Model: F-250
Mileage: 109,000
Trim: crew cab 4 door
2001 Ford F250 super duty 4x4 crew cab with only 109,000 it has a 14" lift, Dana axle,22 " Mazzi wheels,with 40" tires, flow masters exhaust ,custom grill, power windows, power brakes, Sony CD player the interior is real clean, the paint has some scratches but they can get buff out, there's some dings on the body, this truck drives real nice, if you let go of the wheel it drives strait,come and drive it, for any more questions please call me at 775 404 2173 thanks
Ford F-250 for Sale
- Crew cab lariat 4x4 powerstroke diesel leather custom new lift wheels tires new
- Lifted lariat black alloys leather pioneer audio 6.4l powerstroke diesel 4x4(US $31,993.00)
- 2008 ford super duty f-250 4wd crew cab lariat bad engine save thousands
- Lqqk video 64,000 actual miles ranger calif truck no rust highboy 4x4 runs good
- 2010 ford super duty f-250 srw 4wd crew cab 156(US $29,995.00)
- New diesel 6'' lift 22'' wheels 38'' tires navigation camera custom adds 4wd +
Auto Services in Nevada
Yee Bros. Automotive ★★★★★
Ultimate Automotive ★★★★★
Transmission Warehouse ★★★★★
Top Dent Repair ★★★★★
Sparks Muffler Service ★★★★★
Sierra Window Tinting ★★★★★
Auto blog
2015 Ford Mustang fuel economy ratings leaked
Thu, 21 Aug 2014Thinking about buying a new Mustang, but want to know what kind of fuel economy it'll get? Well we have our first indication as the pony-car enthusiasts over at Mustang6G.com have gotten a hold of the Monroney window stickers for a few of the new 2015 Mustang models.
Although the V8 model is not among them, we can now see how the EPA has rated those models with a half dozen pistons or less. The Mustang EcoBoost with the turbo four and a manual transmission has been rated at 22 miles per gallon in the city and 31 on the highway. The V6 manual gets 17 city and 28 highway, while the V6 automatic squeezes out a bit more in the city at 19 mpg but carries the same 28 highway rating.
By way of comparison, the latest Chevy Camaro with the V6 and a stick shift gets the same 17/28 EPA rating as a similarly equipped new 'Stang, and the V6 automatic Camaro gets 18/27 (slightly behind the Ford, but if you opt for the Camaro 2LS with its V6, automatic and 2.92 rear axle ratio, you'll be looking at 19 and 30).
Ford readying Ranger-based Everest SUV?
Fri, 21 Feb 2014Way back in August, we showed you a Ford concept for the Australian market called the Everest. Now, we can show you that work on the new Ranger-based SUV is well under way.
At this stage, it's still quite clearly a mule (note the misalignment of the front and rear doors), wearing the Ranger's front end and the rump of Ford's overseas Territory crossover. The wheelbase is shorter than a Ranger, according to our spy photographers, which strikes us as somewhat odd for a more passenger-oriented vehicle. Disc brakes should be fitted at all four corners, while the new SUV, which will almost certainly wear the Everest name, should sport a new rear suspension.
In terms of looks, we're expecting the Everest Concept to inform the appearance of the production model. Naturally, there will also be some interior tweaks, particularly around the dashboard, which is covered in these photos.
American automakers fall in latest Fortune 500 rankings
Fri, 10 May 2013Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.