Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2000 Ford Focus Se Sedan 4-door 2.0l on 2040-cars

Year:2000 Mileage:206597
Location:

Portage, Wisconsin, United States

Portage, Wisconsin, United States

Smoke-free environment.  Interior in good shape.  Vehicle owner from 35k miles.  Vehicle received the regular routine maintenance, including 3k oil changes. 

Auto Services in Wisconsin

Witt Ford Lincoln ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 120 Green Bay Rd, Sturgeon-Bay
Phone: (920) 746-1050

Waukehas Best Used Cars ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2000 Davidson Rd., Big-Bend
Phone: (414) 350-4457

Truck & Auto Elegance ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Detailing, Window Tinting
Address: N15W22180 Watertown Rd Ste 1, Big-Bend
Phone: (262) 542-2022

The Muffler Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers, Automobile Accessories
Address: 100 Industrial Blvd, Hammond
Phone: (715) 246-2678

Swant Graber Motors ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1690 E Division Ave, Cameron
Phone: (715) 537-5657

Stolze`s Wausau Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 201 Central Bridge St, Wausau
Phone: (715) 845-0005

Auto blog

Report: GM struggling to market turbo technology

Tue, 20 Apr 2010

In the automotive realm, marketing can sometimes prove just as important as the actual product. Take, for instance, Ford's well regarded EcoBoost technology, which couples turbocharging with direct injection to produce more horsepower and reduce fuel consumption. Would it surprise you to hear that General Motors has had similar technology on the market for over three years?
It's true. GM's first turbocharged, direct injected powerplants hit the market for the 2007 model. The 2.0-liter Ecotec mills put down an impressive 260 horsepower and a matching 260 pound-feet of torque, and they were lauded by the press in the engine bays of the Pontiac Solstice, Saturn Sky, Chevrolet Cobalt SS and Chevrolet HHR SS. But few people outside a core group of enthusiasts actually remember this fact.
Says Uwe Grebe, executive director of GM's global advanced engineering, "We didn't have a badge and say, 'This is the most important thing we will put on all our brochures.'" Ford, however, did just that, and it's EcoBoost engines are right at the tips of all our tongues when we discuss today's most advanced powerplants. So, how does The General fix its mistake?

Ford reflects on radical Mustang concept that never reached showrooms

Tue, 25 Jun 2013

The Ford Mustang that we all know and love made major waves in the auto industry way back in 1964 by offering style and reasonable pricing with optional V8 power. Its long hood and short rear deck, combined with a low-slung and sporty cockpit, made a lasting impression in the minds of consumers and car designers alike, and its basic shape has so endured the test of time that it's still in use today.
This being the case, you may be interested to know that the first Mustang of 1964.5 wasn't actually the first Mustang at all, being preceded by a concept car that made its public debut in 1962. This concept was nothing like the car that would eventually make it into production, with a radical wedge shape and a small V4 engine sitting behind the car's two occupants, driving the rear wheels. In other words, the conceptual Mustang was pretty much the complete opposite of the production Mustang besides the name.
Ford has kindly decided go through its massive archive to bring the original Mustang concept back into the public eye. The company goes so far as to pose this question to fans of the pony car: "Should we borrow a few of these style elements for the next iteration of the Mustang?" Check out our image gallery above and then let 'em know what you think in the Comments below.

Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]

Tue, 05 Feb 2013

Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.