Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

3.0l Cd Front Wheel Drive Tires - Front All-season Tires - Rear All-season A/c on 2040-cars

Year:2006 Mileage:62970 Color: Black /
 Other
Location:

Alliance, Ohio, United States

Alliance, Ohio, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.0L 183Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Sedan
Fuel Type:GAS
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: 3MEFM07146R606129 Year: 2006
Warranty: Unspecified
Make: Mercury
Model: Milan
Options: CD Player
Trim: Base Sedan 4-Door
Power Options: Power Windows
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4
Mileage: 62,970
Exterior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 6
Interior Color: Other
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Ohio

Whitesel Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 3646 N County Road 605, Dayton
Phone: (740) 965-5758

Walker`s Transmission Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 486 US Route 68 S, Riverside
Phone: (937) 372-6350

Uncle Sam`s Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 4253 Lewis Ave, Oregon
Phone: (419) 806-0854

Trinity Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 29 W Xenia Ave, Jeffersonville
Phone: (937) 766-9772

Trails West Custom Truck 4x4 Super Center ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Equipment & Parts, Trailer Hitches
Address: 12290 National Rd SW, Sunbury
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Stone`s Auto Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 350 N Main St, Springboro
Phone: (937) 866-3674

Auto blog

Ford recalling 126,000 Fusions and Milans over wheel separation concern

Fri, 09 Dec 2011

Ford has announced a recall of certain Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan vehicles after an investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. A total of 128,616 2010 and 2011 models equipped with steel wheels may have been manufactured with wheel studs that could crack and split over time. If that happens, the vehicle may experience a wheel separation.
According to The Detroit News, the company is aware of a total of 30 wheel separation incidents, one of which occurred on the front of the vehicle. Even so, no injuries have been reported as a result of the defect.
The problem apparently stems from the fact that the mounting pads on the vehicles' steel wheels may have been faulty from the factory. In addition, the wheel mounting face on rear disc brakes may not have been installed properly. Ford will inspect the rear disc face and replace them as necessary. In addition, the company will replace all of the vehicle's wheel studs free of charge. Head to the NHTSA website for more information, and click past the jump to view the full recall notice.

Report: Last Mercury for retail business built on Sunday

Mon, 04 Oct 2010

Ford is already well into winding down its Mercury line, and the autoamker has announced that the very last of the soon-to-be dead brand's products built for retail sales was manufactured on Sunday, October 3. The final Mercury Mariner rolled off of the assembly line at the company's Kansas City facility, putting an end to a brand with over 70 years of history behind it.
Even after the Mariner heads off into the automotive sunset, Ford says that it will continue to manufacture a handful of Mercury models for fleet and government service for a while longer, though mum's the word on how long we can expect that practice to continue.
Interestingly enough, according to USA Today, most incentives on Mercury vehicles have all but dried up, even as the brand's August production increased by 120 percent compared to July's figures. Instead of cash on the hood, some areas are offering no-cost maintenance or similar programs. Even so, Mercury has continued to out-sell Lincoln right to the end - besting Ford's luxury arm's sales by nine percent in August.

NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"