2004 Saturn Vue on 2040-cars
4885 East Miami River Rd., Cleves, Ohio, United States
Engine:2.2L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic CVT
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5GZCZ33D94S829483
Stock Num: 829483
Make: Saturn
Model: Vue
Year: 2004
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Gray
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 152250
Nice clean good looking and running SUV FWD 4-Cyl gas saver looks and runs great tires like new all power am-fm-cd Guaranteed Financing and Warranties available on all cars. Need more peace of mind when buying from us? If your vehicle ever needs repairs, Weinle Motorsports will work on your vehicle for 1/2 price as long as you own it! Speak to your salesperson for complete details. Additional photos available on our website at www.weinlemotorsports.comCall us today at one of the following numbers:[877-458-3308877-458-3308877-458-3308
Saturn Vue for Sale
- 2008 saturn vue xe(US $9,495.00)
- 2008 saturn vue xr(US $14,854.00)
- 2003 saturn vue(US $4,495.00)
- 2008 saturn vue xe(US $5,990.00)
- 2009 saturn vue xe(US $14,580.00)
- 2005 saturn vue(US $5,988.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
World Auto Parts ★★★★★
West Park Shell Auto Care ★★★★★
Waterloo Transmission ★★★★★
Walt`s Auto Inc ★★★★★
Transmission Engine Pros ★★★★★
Total Auto Glass ★★★★★
Auto blog
Recalled Saturn Ion facing separate federal safety probe
Fri, 21 Mar 2014General Motors may be staring down another recall campaign for one of its models already embroiled in its high-profile ignition recall. The 2003-2007 Saturn Ion is already among the 1.6-million vehicles being recalled for faulty ignition switches, and now new light is being shed on a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigation over 2004-2007 models centering on a loss of power steering.
The government safety regulator has received 846 complaints about the problem and claims that GM has had 3,489 reports of failure. Of those cases, there have been 16 accidents and 2 injuries reported, according to Automotive News. While NHTSA has been conducting an investigation since September 2011, no recall has been issued yet.
The inquiry's length was brought to light by an organization called the National Legal and Policy Center that alleges GM and NHTSA have known about the problem but are delaying a recall. It has sent a letter to CEO Mary Barra asking "to recall Saturn Ions for the model years 2004 through 2007 without further delay." The letter in question is available in full on the group's website.
VIDEO: Saturn's demise? We blame Jim Gaffigan*
Fri, 02 Oct 2009
Click above to view the video after the jump
When the deal to sell Saturn to Penske Automotive fell through, there were likely a lot of surprised people at General Motors' Detroit, MI headquarters. Penske released a statement saying that the reason the deal fell through after months of good faith negotiations was that a suitable post-GM supply of vehicles could not be found. However, after reacquainting ourselves with over eight minutes of outtakes from Jim Gaffigan's old Saturn commercial, we're thinking the comedic pitchman is to blame.
GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect
Tue, 17 Aug 20102010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.