1985 Chevy Blazer on 2040-cars
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:383 Rebuilt
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Used
Make: Chevrolet
Interior Color: Blue
Model: Blazer
Number of Cylinders: 8
Year: 1985
Trim: 2 Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 8,500
Sub Model: K5
Exterior Color: Tan
No body rust and no dents, but could use a paint job. No accidents and has a clear title. Runs great with horsepower to spare. Brand new off road all terrain tires. Custom made hood with air intake. Stored in garage at all times. Factory 3 speed. Well maintained with regular oil changes and factory service. A fun off road truck for seasons.
|
Chevrolet Blazer for Sale
- 1990 chevrolet blazer scottsdale sport utility 2-door 5.7l(US $1,850.00)
- 1985 red&tan chevrolet k5 silverado blazer 4x4,81189 miles,heat&a/c,am/fm stereo
- All original 1980 chevrolet blazer 4x4 rust free orig paint. solid!(US $14,400.00)
- 1991 chevrolet blazer silverado sport utility 2-door 5.7l
- 2007 chevrolet trailblazer 2wd 4dr ls(US $5,495.00)
- Classic red 2001 red chevrolet "chevy" blazer 188,000 miles, 4 wheel drive 6 cyl(US $3,500.00)
Auto Services in Nevada
Winners Circle Kustom Autobody ★★★★★
Wayne`s Automotive Center ★★★★★
Total Eclipse Window Tinting ★★★★★
Sudden Impact Auto Body and Collision Repair Specialists ★★★★★
Steel & Son Motors ★★★★★
Quick Auto Repair Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
PickupTrucks.com's latest test results in a familiar winner [w/video]
Wed, 19 Jun 2013PickupTrucks.com has gone and thrown the latest batch of half-ton pickups into a cage match to see who would come out on top. The site put the 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500, GMC Sierra 1500, 2013 Ford F-150, Ram 1500, Toyota Tundra and Nissan Titan through a battery of tests. Those included 0-60 miles per hour acceleration, 60-0 mph deceleration, fuel economy, a hill climb, and payload and towing. They even threw the rigs on an autocross course to evaluate overall handling. Each truck was given points based on how it scored in each evaluation.
Who came out on top? Somewhat surprisingly, the 2013 Ford F-150 walked away with the gold, though fewer than 50 points separated first and fourth place. Head over to PickupTrucks.com to read the full evaluation and the final results. You may be shocked to see exactly where some of the segment's newest additions placed. You can also watch a video on the test below.
Conquest and controversy conclude the 2014 Rolex 24 at Daytona [spoilers]
Sun, 26 Jan 2014If you don't wish to know who won the 2014 Rolex 24 at Daytona, you should avert your eyes right now. We'll even give you a double-space to skedaddle...
For those of you still with us, the first race in the United SportsCar Championship (USCC) is done, but the discussions about it certainly won't end for a while. Daytona Prototypes claimed the first four overall places, the top spot taken by the No. 5 Action Express Coyote-Chevrolet Corvette DP driven by Joao Barbosa, Christian Fittipaldi, Sebastien Bourdain and Burt Friselle. The 16th and final caution of the race bunched the field up for an eight-minute sprint to the flag, so the first place getter finished just 1.4 seconds ahead of the No. 10 Wayne Taylor Racing Dallara-Chevrolet Corvette DP driven by Max Angelelli. Third place went to Brian Friselle in the No. 9 Action Express Chevrolet Corvette DP, 20 seconds down. Chevrolet power hasn't taken the overall win since 2003, eleven years later it scores a one-two-three-four. The No. 6 Muscle Milk/Pickett Racing ORECA-Nissan 03 scored fifth place, the top LMP2 finisher.
The Prototype Challenge class win went to the No. 54 CORE Autosport team of Colin Braun, Jon Bennett, Mark Wilkins and James Gue.
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2024. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.018 s, 7277 u