1955 Ford F100 4x4 1983 Chevy Chasiss on 2040-cars
Point Pleasant, West Virginia, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:350
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-100
Trim: GREY
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Drive Type: CHEVY 4X4
Mileage: 999,999
Exterior Color: Blue
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Blue
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
I HAVE FOR SALE A 1955 FORD PICK-UP SITTING ON A 1983 CHEVY CHASSIS. IT HAS THE 83 350 MOTOR AND AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION AND TRANSFER CASE ALL FROM THE SAME BLAZER. I AM SELLING THIS TRUCK FOR A FRIEND. I HAVE DROVE IT A COUPLE OF TIMES IT RUNS AND DRIVES GOOD. I SEE NO PROBLEMS DRIVING IT HOME. THE BODY IS A 55 FORD PICK-UP THE HOOD RAISES BY HYDRAULICS THIS IS A OLDER BUILD I DO NOT KNOW HOW LONG AGO IT HAS BEEN THIS IS THE WAY HE GOT THE TRUCK. I HAVE LOOKED IT OVER THE BEST I COULD IT HAS BEEN WELL DONE. IT DOES NEED DOOR GLASS BOTH OF THOSE ARE MISSING. OVER ALL WITH A LITTLE BIT OF YOUR OWN TOUCHES IT WOULD MAKE A NICE VEHICLE THAT WOULD TURN HEADS. IT HAS CHEVY TRUCK RALLIES WITH 35 1050 15 INCH TIRES AND THE FENDER WELLS HAS BEEN CUT OUT AND A VERY NICE JOB DOING IT. THE TRUCK SHIFTS GOOD AND FOUR WHEEL DRIVE WORKS GOOD. A FEW DAYS AGO I HAD CONTACTED THE OWNER WHO ORIGINALLY BUILT THIS TRUCK HE SAID HE HAD SPENT A LOT OF MONEY BUILDING THIS TRUCK HE FIRST BOUGHT IT WITH THE CAB AND BED ONLY SETTING ON THE BLAZER FRAME. HE HAD TO PUT THE REST OF THE TRUCK TOGETHER. HE SAID THE GRILL IS A 1954 THAT DIDN'T COME WITH THE TRUCK. HE HAD BOTH TITLES TO THIS TRUCK ONE WAS A 1955 FORD TRUCK TITLE THAT WENT TO THE BODY THE OTHER WAS A 1983 TITLE THAT WENT TO THE BLAZER. TO MAKE THIS TRUCK COMPLETELY LEGAL HE COULD NOT USE THE 1955 TITLE. THE TRUCK WAS BUILT IN W.V. HE TOOK BOTH TITLES TO THE DMV THE 1983 TITLE OVER RODE THE 1955 TITLE THE TRUCK WAS INSPECTED AND WAS GIVEN A W.V. 1983 ASM (SELF ASSEMBLED) TITLE WITH THE 1955 CAB VIN NUMBER. THIS TITLE IS NOT RECONSTRUCTED. MY FRIEND BOUGHT THIS TRUCK FROM THE MAN IN W.V. AND TOOK IT TO OHIO. SO THIS TRUCK WENT THROUGH THE SECOND STATE INSPECTION. HE WAS GIVEN A CLEAR OHIO ASM TITLE. THAT IS IN HIS NAME HE IS THE OWNER OF THIS TRUCK. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS TITLE PLEASE LET ME KNOW BEFORE BIDDING. THIS TRUCK IS ADVERTISED LOCAL SO WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMOVE IT AT ANYTIME. THE RESERVE PRICE IS VERY FAIR. HE IS ASKING FOR A $500.00 NON-REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT WITHIN 5 DAYS THE TRUCK MUST BE PAID IN FULL AND PICKED UP WITHIN 14 DAYS UNLESS OTHER ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE. ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL (304)675-5863 THANKS FOR BIDDING
On Jul-15-13 at 19:19:45 PDT, seller added the following information:
I HAVE A FRIEND THAT WILL DELIVER THIS TRUCK 500 MILES OR SO FOR A SMALL FEE. HE WOULD BE ABLE TO BRING IT TO YOUR DOOR WITH ALL PAPER WORK IN HAND. THANKS
Ford F-100 for Sale
1951 ford f100 truck 52 53 54 55
1960 ford f-100 truck
1968 ford f100
1959 ford truck f100 57 56 58 60
1968 ford f100
1956 ford f-100 with 460 and 4x4Auto Services in West Virginia
Stewart`s Collision Center ★★★★★
Rockland Auto Repairs ★★★★★
Premier Pre Owned ★★★★★
Jones Automotive ★★★★★
G & G Tire Service ★★★★★
Steve`s Auto Service Center ★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports explains its disdain for infotainment
Thu, 20 Mar 2014One of the perks of reviewing all manner of cars and trucks is that we're exposed to all the different infotainment systems. Whether Cadillac's CUE, Chrysler's UConnect, BMW's iDrive or MyFord Touch, we sample each and every infotainment system on the market.
Not surprisingly, some are better than others. It seems consumers have come to a similar consensus, with Consumer Reports claiming that Ford and Lincoln, Cadillac and Honda offer the worst user infotainment experiences. Not surprisingly, you won't find much argument among the Autoblog staff.
Take a look below to see just what it is about the latest batch of infotainment systems that grinds CR's gears. After that, scroll down into Comments and let us know if you agree with the mag's views.
Ford announces 2014 F-150 SVT Raptor Special Edition
Tue, 09 Apr 2013Ford has pulled the wraps off its anticipated 2014 F-150 SVT Raptor Special Edition model, a new variant of the popular street-legal off-road specialist. In a nutshell, the "special" is all cosmetic - there are no mechanical upgrades to the truck and its 6.2-liter V8 (411 horsepower and 434 pound-feet of torque), Torsen limited-slip differential, beadlock-capable wheels and internal triple-bypass FOX Racing Shox dampers all remain untouched.
The SVT Raptor Special Edition, which adds cosmetic enhancements to the existing Luxury Package, will be offered in Ruby Red Metallic and Tuxedo Black Metallic with box-side graphics. The interior upgrades include Brick Red seat bolsters (with black inserts), cloth honeycomb highlights and a console top finish panel.
As of now, Ford has only release a couple pictures of the Special Edition model. But check back later, as we will update the gallery when additional high-res images are released later today, and be sure to peruse the press release below for all the details.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.