1966 Ford Thunderbird Landau Hardtop 2-door 6.4l on 2040-cars
Hudson, New York, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.4L 6391CC 390Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Private Seller
Body Type:Hardtop
Fuel Type:GAS
Make: Ford
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Model: Thunderbird
Trim: Base Hardtop 2-Door
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Disability Equipped: No
Drive Type: U/K
Mileage: 999,999
Exterior Color: Teal
Number of Cylinders: 8
Interior Color: Teal
Ford Thunderbird for Sale
- 1990 ford thunderbird super coupe 3.8l, runs, 3yrs stored, no reserve
- 2002 ford thunderbird roadster premium hardtop 17in alloy color accent pkg(US $19,950.00)
- 1957 ford supercharged thunderbird f-bird(US $190,000.00)
- 1956 ford thunderbird w/ hardtop! 33k miles! trades/offers?
- 2003 thunderbird convertible 2-tops leather chromes only 35k miles 02 04 05(US $22,997.00)
- 1955 ford thunderbird base convertible 2-door 4.8l(US $32,000.00)
Auto Services in New York
Zoni Customs ★★★★★
Williams Toyota Scion ★★★★★
Watertown Auto Repair Svc ★★★★★
VOS Motorsports ★★★★★
Village Automotive Center ★★★★★
V J`s Car Care ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford talking unibody Ranger replacement
Mon, 18 Feb 2013Now here's some welcome news. Car and Driver reports Ford is seriously mulling a replacement for the recently deceased Ranger, but the successor to the compact pickup's throne may not look anything like what we've seen from the nameplate in the past.
While speaking at the 2013 Chicago Auto Show, Doug Scott, marketing manager for Ford Trucks, said there's still a market for a smaller pickup, but that buyers expect to see a larger differentiation between the smaller utility vehicles and their full size counterparts in price, capability and fuel economy.
According to Scott, that means a vehicle with a payload capacity of around 1,000 pounds paired with a towing capacity of 3,000 pounds and "a dramatic reduction in fuel consumption." But the biggest piece of that recipe is the price tag, and Scott says to keep the MSRP far enough away from the already cheap F-150, the answer could come in the form of a unibody design. Scott says target customers in this market don't care whether the truck has a traditional frame or not, so long as it's tough enough to do the job and has the capability they need.
2013 Ford Mustang V6
Mon, 10 Jun 2013Secretary Trim, Evolved
There was a time not so long ago when opting for a base Ford Mustang meant getting little more than some sheetmetal, an anemic four-cylinder engine and what may very well have been the world's most disappointing automatic transmission. During the Fox Body years, Ford seemed hell-bent on living up to Carroll Shelby's derogatory description of the coupe as little more than a runabout for demure office assistants, and the result was a base model with fewer sporting intentions than a Dilbert day calendar.
Some 20 years later, hopping behind the wheel of an entry-level pony is an entirely different experience. With all of the menacing aesthetics of the brawnier GT, a well-equipped interior and a drivetrain that toes the line between efficiency and power better than few before it, the 2013 Ford Mustang V6 is an attractive option for buyers in the big coupe market. But is it attractive enough to forgo the beastly GT?
Is Tesla's next project an F-150 competitor? [w/poll]
Wed, 13 Nov 2013What's the future look like for Tesla after it launches the Model X CUV and possibly a smaller, sub-Model S sedan? Would you believe a pickup truck? Yes, Tesla could be looking to use its EV know-how to take the fight to Ford and the F-150, based on comments made by company founder Elon Musk.
"If you're trying to replace the most gasoline miles driven, you have to look at what people are buying," Musk said during an impromptu Q&A session following a speech at Business Insider's Ignition conference. "[The F-150 is] the best selling car in America. If people are voting that's their car, then that's the car we have to deliver."
And while the idea of electric pickup may sound kind of absurd to some, Musk makes a very valid point - if Tesla's goal is to replace gas miles with electrical miles, it simply can't afford to ignore pickups.